Antennas side by side: Ground Plane versus Delta Loop


At the moment I am using two antennas for 27MHz operation: a 1/4 wave Ground Plane and a Delta Loop, and I had the chance to do a little comparison between them. For who’s not familiar with how these two antennas look, with my inexistent Windows paint skills I have quickly illustrated how mine look and how they’re placed:

The one on the left is the Ground Plane and has 5 elements of 268cm each: the vertical one is connected to the central wire of the 50 ohm coaxial feeder cable, the rest (“radials”) are connected to the outer shield of the cable. Typical impedance of a 1/4 wave Ground Plane antenna depends very much on on the angle between the vertical element and the radials, it’s around 25 ohm for 90 degrees and at 180 degrees should be around 70 ohm; i have used around 130-140 degrees wich should bring the impedance to aproximately 50 ohm, but it didn’t as we’ll see later. It is a omnidirectional antenna, has vertical radiation polarisation and it’s takeoff angle is around 20 degrees.

The Delta Loop on the right is basically a full wave loop in a triangle shape, and fed on the right corner as I did makes it’s polarisation inbetween vertical and horizontal, wich shouldn’t matter too much for DX but it will either be better or worse for line of sight contacts depending on what type  of polarisation your partner is using. To obtain vertical polarisation the feedpoint should be at a level where a line parallel to the ground trough that point would split the antenna in two equal perimeters; for horizontal polarisation, a vertical imaginary line trough the feedpoint should split the antenna in 2 equal perimeters as well. The impedance is around 100 ohm for a triangle with equal sides so it shouldn’t adapt perfectly to 50 ohm feedline, but closing one of the angles like I have done should bring it close to 50 ohm; if instead of a triangle we would make a square from the same perimeter, it would have 50 ohm feed impedance. Because it’s balanced it will need a 1:1 BalUn to work correctly with coaxial (unbalanced) cable, and it can be done either by winding a bifilar wire on a properly chosen toroid (i have used Amidon T80-6, enough for about 100W RF power), or by winding 15-20 laps of 50 ohm RG-58U coaxial cable on a PVC 10cm diameter pipe (enough for much more power). Length of the loop should be a full wave loop, but experiments proved that it properly tunes with a loop slightly longer than full wave: in my case, almost 10% more, 11.7 meters. This really depends on the type of wire used to build it, the height above ground level and what other objects are nearby. The takeoff angle is around 25 degrees but it has about 2dB gain over the Ground Plane so in some situations it might perform better; also the closed loop should offer protection against static noise and improve reception in some cases. It is also slightly directional, favoring the direction perpendicular on the triangle’s plane by 3dB.

Enough theory, now to the real life testing on the next page.



I will be running under special callsign 233RC103/QRP whenever the propagation allows it, with only 3W output into either vertical 1/4 GP antenna or testing the new Delta Loop. Working frequencies 27.555 or 27.610 MHz USB.

Contact with 328MIC001 in the middle of the night


After we finally got some propagation back for a few days, tonight (14.12.2009)  i got the chance to have a very interesting contact. Interesting because it was done at 02:00 local time and the 800Km distance between Bucharest and Zagreb is too big for direct wave and rather small for F-layer reflexion. Plus, 328MIC001 comes here barely over the noise constantly for about 3 hours now, so it’s not a sporadic event.

Signals are very weak on both of our ends (R 2-4, S 0-1), but helped us to get in contact.

73s and all the best Rocky !

QSO with 91RSN300 from Java Island, Indonesia


A QSO I had on 31.10.2009 with Rudi – 91RSN300 from Java Island, Indonesia, about 10.000Km away.